People ex rel. Dunn v. Bunker
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bank of America v. Cory (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)
- Waldauer v. Britton (Tenn. 1938)
- County of San Diego v. Croghan (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
- Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Douglas County (Wis. 1908)
- Board of County Commissioners v. Dickey (Minn. 1902)
- State v. Duncan (Ind. 1899)
- Saylor v. Trotter (Tenn. 1923)
- County of Kern v. Fay (Cal. 1901)
- Collier v. Montgomery County (Tenn. 1900)
- County of San Bernardino v. Davidson (Cal. 1896)
- People ex rel. Dunn v. Van Ness (Cal. 1888)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Action to recover from the defendant moneys received by ,him, as commissioner of immigration, under section 2955 of the Political Code. The court below allowed the defendant for his salary and office expenses actually paid, and rendered judgment against him for the surplus, with damages and interest as specified in section 437 of the Political Code.
1. The defendant, having assumed to act under a
2. The court did not err in refusing to allow, as items of office expenses, sums not paid to deputies. It is true, section 2969 was added to the Political Code, as a new section, after defendant received the moneys, but under that section there is full provision for compensation to the deputies if they are or shall be entitled thereto.
3. Under the statute, the defendant cannot retain the money because a person of whom money was collected has instituted an action against him to recover it. Having collected it, he should have let it take the regular course, viz., payment to the state treasury.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Boss, J., and McKinstry, J., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.