Oullahan v. Morrissey
Oullahan v. Morrissey
73 Cal. 297; 14 P. 864; 1887 Cal. LEXIS 663
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Waldrop v. Maser (Mont. 1934)
- Judnick v. Judnick (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)
- Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. Waymire (Cal. 1907)
- Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior Court (Cal. 1899)
- Fairbanks v. Lampkin (Cal. 1893)
- Sellick v. De Carlow (Cal. 1892)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
— The plaintiff, having consented to the entry of the judgment against himself, cannot appeal from it, or if he can, can be heard only as to that portion to which he did not consent. That in this case is at the most the demand for costs, which, being less than three hundred dollars, does not give this court jurisdiction.
The appeal must be dismissed.
So ordered.'
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.