California Supreme Court, 1888

Hershey v. Kness

Hershey v. Kness
California Supreme Court · Decided February 14, 1888 · Hayne
75 Cal. 115; 16 P. 548; 1888 Cal. LEXIS 489
Hershey v. Kness

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

All the appellant’s specifications were stricken from the transcript, for the reason that they were mere interpolations, and not a part of the statement as settled by the judge of the court below. This took away all right to be heard on the motion for new trial.

The appellant’s objections to the sufficiency of the complaint are without merit.

We therefore advise that the judgment and order be affirmed.

Foote, C., and Belcher, C. 0., concurred.

The Court.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the judgment and order are affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.