Holland v. Wilson
California Supreme Court
Holland v. Wilson, 76 Cal. 434 (Cal. 1888)
18 P. 412; 1888 Cal. LEXIS 905
Thornton
Holland v. Wilson
Opinion of the Court
We think the court below ruled correctly in sustaining the demurrer to the portion of the answer numbered 3. The “plans and specifications” referred to in the agreement were a part of the contract, and should have been filed in the recorder’s office under section 1183 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The averment as to' filing is insufficient, in failing to show that the plans and specifications were filed.
Judgment affirmed.
Searls, C. J., Sharpstein, J., McFarland, J., MeJcinstry, J., and Paterson, J., concurred.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- J. C. HOLLAND v. WARREN WILSON
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Building Contkact—Plans and Specifications must be Filed. —Plans and specifications referred to in and forming part of a building contract must be filed in the office of the connty recorder; otherwise, the contract is void, under section 1183 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and no recovery thereon can be had by either of the parties thereto.