Ex Parte Lewis

California Supreme Court
Ex Parte Lewis, 79 Cal. 95 (Cal. 1889)
21 P. 553; 1889 Cal. LEXIS 678
Works

Ex Parte Lewis

Opinion of the Court

Works, J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The ground upon which it is claimed that the petitioner is illegally imprisoned is, that he is held under a warrant of the governor on an alleged requisition of the governor of the state of Colorado, and that the warrant and such requisition are each and both illegal, in that no copy of any indictment found, nor any copy of any affidavit made before a magistrate of any state or territory, charging the petitioner with having committed treason, felony, or any other crime, either certified as authentic by the governor of the state of Colorado or at all, has ever been produced to the governor of the state of California.

The officer having the petitioner in charge makes return that he holds the petitioner by virtue of a warrant issued by the governor of this state, which warrant is made part of his return, and recites, among other things:—

“Whereas, it has been represented to me by the governor of the state of Colorado that Peter R. Lewis stands charged with the crime of fraudulent conveyance, committed in the county of Arapahoe, in said state, and that he fled from the justice of that state, and has taken refuge in the state of California; and the said governor of Colorado having, in'pursuance of the constitution and laws of the United States, demanded of me that I shall cause the said Peter R. Lewis to be arrested and_ delivered to *97Charles A. Hawley, who is authorized to receive him into his custody and convey him back to the said state of Colorado; and whereas, the said representation and demand is accompanied by a complaint and information, affidavits, and warrant of arrest, whereby the said Peter E. Lewis stands charged with said crime, and with having fled from said state and taken refuge in the state of California, which are certified by the governor of the state of Colorado to be authentic,” etc.

The facts thus recited are not disputed, and we think they show a sufficient foundation for the warrant.

Writ denied.

Thornton, J., and Beatty, C. J., concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ex parte PETER R. LEWIS, on Habeas Corpus.
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Extradition of Fugitive from Justice—Recitals in Governor’s Warrant— Habeas Corpus.—The recitals in the warrant of arrest of a fugitive from justice, issued by the governor of this state upon the requisition of the governor of another state, stating that the requisition was made in pursuance of the constitution and laws of the United States, and was accompanied by a complaint and information, affidavits, and warrant of arrest, whereby the fugitive stands charged with a specified crime, and with having fled from said state and taken refuge in the state of California, which are certified by the governor of such other state to be authentic, show a sufficient foundation for the warrant of arrest, and the facta thus recited will be taken as true upon a writ of habeas corptts, if not disputed. It is not necessary to set out in the warrant a copy of the indictment or affidavit charging the petitioner with crime, nor a copy of the governor’s authentication thereof.