Irvine v. Davy
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Munger v. Nelson (Mont. 1921)
- Harr v. Kight (Idaho 1910)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The demurrers to the complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, were properly overruled.
The default of the defendants for failing to answer the complaint within the time allowed bylaw for]answering was properly entered. The filing of an answer after the default had been entered did not affect the default.
The motion to set aside said default was properly denied, no ground appearing for setting said default aside.
Judgment affirmed.
McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.