California Supreme Court, 1891

In re Get Young

California Supreme Court · Decided June 30, 1891 · Foote

90 Cal. 77; 27 P. 158; 1891 Cal. LEXIS 886

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Spurrier v. Spurrier (Okla. 1925)
Hernaiz Targa & Co. v. Vivas (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1914)
Hernaiz Targa & Co. v. Vivas (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1914)
American Railroad Co. v. Quiñones (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1911)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to revoke an order granting letters of guardianship of a minor.

The order made by the probate court appointing the *78guardian was one which it was within the jurisdiction of that tribunal to make, and it was itself appealable. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 963, subd. 3.)

Hence the appellate court will not entertain jurisdiction of the appeal now here. (Goyhinech v. Goyhinech, 80 Cal. 409; Larkin v. Larkin, 76 Cal. 323; Eureka & T. R. R. Co. v. McGrath, 74 Cal. 49; Tripp v. Santa Rosa R. R. Co., 69 Cal. 631.)

The matter does not come within the rule as to void judgments laid down in People v. Green, 74 Cal. 400; 5 Am. St. Rep. 448.

We therefore advise that the appeal be dismissed.

Fitzgerald, C., and Belcher, C., concurred.

The Court.

— For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the appeal is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.