Ex Parte Heylman
Ex Parte Heylman
92 Cal. 492; 28 P. 675; 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1237
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Williams (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California 1962)
- E. A. Hoffman Candy Co. v. City of Newport Beach (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
- McKnight v. Hodge (Wash. 1909)
- Servonitz v. State (Wis. 1907)
- California Apartment Ass'n v. City of Stockton (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)
- Eye Clinic, P.C. v. Jackson-Madison County General Hospital (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998)
- Joint Highway Dist. No. 13 v. Hinman (Cal. 1934)
- Wittschen v. Commissioner (United States Board of Tax Appeals 1931)
- Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaig (Cal. 1925)
- Ex parte Byles (Ark. 1910)
- Ex parte Haskell (Cal. 1896)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Ordinances similar to that which petitioner was convicted of having violated have frequently-been considered by this court. The validity of such ordinances is not now an open question here.
We are unable to discover any legal ground upon which the petitioner could be discharged.
Petitioner remanded to the custody of the chief of police of the city and county of San Francisco.
Be Haven, J., and Beatty, C. J., dissented.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.