Lord v. Thomas

California Supreme Court
Lord v. Thomas, 3 Cal. Unrep. 424 (Cal. 1891)
27 P. 410; 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1278

Lord v. Thomas

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This case cannot be distinguished in principle from that of Bailey v. Sloan, 65 Cal. 387, 4 Pac. 349, and on the authority of that case the judgment must be affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
LORD v. THOMAS
Status
Published
Syllabus
Unlawful Detainer—Jurisdiction of Superior Court.—In an action by a landlord against Ms tenant for $183 rent due under a lease, and, as a second cause of action, for the restitution of the same premises, which were alleged to have been unlawfully detained after the expiration of a subsequent lease thereof, with damages for such unlawful detention, judgment was rendered for the rent demanded ($183), but restitution of the premises was denied. Held, that the superior court had jurisdiction to render the judgment in question, though it was for less than the jurisdictional amount ($300) of such court, since the relief demanded in prayer of judgment was within the jurisdiction of the court. Following Bailey v. Sloan, 65 Cal. 387, 4 Pac. 349.