California Supreme Court, 1892

Donohue v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court · Decided February 4, 1892

93 Cal. 252; 28 P. 1043; 1892 Cal. LEXIS 551

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Shaw v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty. (Cal. 2017)
Nessbit v. Superior Court (Cal. 1931)
Mechler v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
Widney v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
Widney v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
Abercrombie v. Edwards (Okla. 1916)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The Court.

Petitioners aver that they are defendants in an action pending in th.e court of respondents, in which one Hinkel is plaintiff; that said action is an action to quiet title to certain described lands; that petitioners have answered in said action, setting up certain defenses; that petitioners have demanded a jury trial of *253said action; that their demand has been refused, and that the respondents are about to try said action without a jury. Wherefore petitioners pray for a writ of mandate, commanding respondents to comply with petitioners’ demand for a jury, and “ not to undertake to try or to set said action for trial without a jury.”

Whether or not the petitioners should have a jury trial of said action is a question of law which the superior court has jurisdiction to hear and determine; and if any error has been, or shall be, committed in determining that question, the petitioners have a sufficient remedy in the ordinary course of law by appeal.

■ The prayer of petitioners is denied, and the proceeding dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.