California Supreme Court, 1892

Pilster v. Highton

Pilster v. Highton
California Supreme Court · Decided November 26, 1892
3 Cal. Unrep. 632; 31 P. 580

Pilster v. Highton

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an action upon a promissory note. The complaint was demurred to upon the grounds that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and was ambiguous and uncertain. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendant given ten days to answer. He declined to answer, and thereupon judgment was entered against him, from which he appeals. The complaint was inartistically drawn, but we think it must be held sufficient. Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.