House v. Meyer
California Supreme Court
House v. Meyer, 100 Cal. 592 (Cal. 1893)
35 P. 308; 1893 Cal. LEXIS 838
Haven
House v. Meyer
Opinion of the Court
The demurrer to the complaint was properly overruled. In an action like this, to recover damages resulting from the alleged negligence of a defendant, a general allegation of negligence upon the part of the defendant is sufficient. “The negligence is the ultimate fact to be pleaded, and is not a legal conclusion.” (Bliss on Code Pleading, sec. 211.)
Nor was it incumbent on the plaintiffs to allege that they were not guilty of contributory negligence. (Robinson v. Western Pac. R. R. Co., 48 Cal. 409.)
The appeal in this case is without merit.
Judgment and order affirmed.
McFarland, J., and Fitzgerald, J., concurred.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- THOMAS HOUSE et ux. v. MARIUS MEYER
- Cited By
- 29 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Negligence—Pleading—General Allegations. — A general allegation of negligence upon the part of the defendant is sufficient in an action to recover damages resulting from the alleged negligence of the defendant. Id.—Negligence an Ultimate Pact.—Negligence is an ultimate fact and not a conclusion of law. Id.—Contributory Negligence—Complaint.—It is not incumbent upon the plaintiff in an action for damages for negligence to allege a want of contributory negligence.