House v. Meyer
House v. Meyer
100 Cal. 592; 35 P. 308; 1893 Cal. LEXIS 838
House v. Meyer
Opinion of the Court
The demurrer to the complaint was properly overruled. In an action like this, to recover damages resulting from the alleged negligence of a defendant, a general allegation of negligence upon the part of the defendant is sufficient. βThe negligence is the ultimate fact to be pleaded, and is not a legal conclusion.β (Bliss on Code Pleading, sec. 211.)
Nor was it incumbent on the plaintiffs to allege that they were not guilty of contributory negligence. (Robinson v. Western Pac. R. R. Co., 48 Cal. 409.)
The appeal in this case is without merit.
Judgment and order affirmed.
McFarland, J., and Fitzgerald, J., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.