Davis v. Hart
Davis v. Hart
103 Cal. 530; 37 P. 486; 1894 Cal. LEXIS 817
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Butler v. McSpadden (Okla. 1910)
- Duisenberg-Wichman & Co. v. Johnson (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
- Lutz v. Merchants Nat. Bank (Cal. 1918)
- Bullock v. Bullock (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
- Bullock v. Bullock (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
- Rudd v. Wilson (Okla. 1912)
- Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. Scott (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)
- Nettograph Machine Co. v. Brown and Trueblood (Okla. 1907)
- Kelly v. Bradbury (Cal. 1894)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
There is no brief on file by respondent, nor was the case orally argued in his behalf. ■
As the record shows that the findings are attacked by the specifications on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support them, it follows on the authority of Richter v. Fresno Canal etc. Co., 101 Cal. 582, that the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed.
So ordered.
McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.