California Supreme Court, 1894

Kelly v. Bradbury

California Supreme Court · Decided September 28, 1894 · Fitzgerald, Haven, McFarland

104 Cal. 237; 37 P. 872; 1894 Cal. LEXIS 887

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Duisenberg-Wichman & Co. v. Johnson (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
Lutz v. Merchants Nat. Bank (Cal. 1918)
Bullock v. Bullock (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
Bullock v. Bullock (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
Lawrence v. Johnson (Cal. 1900)
Mountain Tunnel Gravel Mining Co. v. Bryan (Cal. 1896)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Fitzgerald, J.

It appears from tbe record that tbe verdict of tbe jury is assailed by the specifications, on tbe ground of tbe insufficiency of tbe evidence to support it.

There is no brief on file by respondent, nor was tbe case orally argued in his behalf; it therefore follows, on the authority of Richter v. Fresno etc. Co., 101 Cal. 582, and Davis v. Hart, 103 Cal. 530, that the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed.

So ordered

McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred;

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.