Burr v. Navarro Mill Co.
Burr v. Navarro Mill Co.
Opinion of the Court
Respondent moved to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that it was not filed within the time prescribed by the rules of the court. It is apparent from the certificate of the clerk of the lower court that such is the fact; and the appeal must be dismissed, unless good cause for the delay appears.
The action is one for personal injuries, and a judgment was entered upon the verdict of the jury for the sum of $1,000 in favor of plaintiff. Subsequently defendant appealed the case to this court, and gave a bond with two sureties, staying execution upon the judgment. After the appeal was perfected and the stay bond given, the defendant was adjudged an insolvent debtor, an assignee was appointed, and an order made by the court staying all proceedings against the insolvent. Thereafter, upon application of respondent, the order was modified to the extent of allowing the present action to be prosecuted to final judgment, for the purpose of fixing the liability of the sureties upon the aforesaid bond. The attorneys representing the defendant in the trial of the case and on the appeal thereof were regularly served with no
Reference
- Full Case Name
- BURR v. NAVARRO MILL CO.
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeal—Delay In Filing—Dismissal.—An appeal not filed within the time prescribed by court rules will be dismissed, no good cause for the delay being shown, though no notice of the motion to dismiss was served on -appellant’s assignee in insolvency, he having, however, knowledge of the notice served on appellant’s attorneys.