1894
700 California Supreme Court opinions from 1894.
- La Fetra v. Gleason 35 P. 765, (Cal. 1894)
- Cal. Loan & Trust Co. v. Hammell 35 P. 765, (Cal. 1894)
- Mccartney v. Dennison 35 P. 766, (Cal. 1894)
- Freeman v. Kieffer 35 P. 767, (Cal. 1894)
- Smith v. Ellis 35 P. 764, (Cal. 1894)
- McDonald v. S. Cal. Ry. 35 P. 646, (Cal. 1894)
- San Diego Water Co. v. Pac. Coast S.S. Co. 35 P. 651, (Cal. 1894)
- Brown v. Fresno Raisin Co. 35 P. 639, (Cal. 1894)
- Symons v. Bunnell 35 P. 770, (Cal. 1894)
- Ogden v. Packard 35 P. 642, (Cal. 1894)
- Raskin v. Robarts 35 P. 763, (Cal. 1894)
- Russ Lumber & Mill Co. v. Roggenkamp 35 P. 643, (Cal. 1894)
- N. Counties Inv. Tr. v. Cadman 35 P. 557, (Cal. 1894)
- Dougall v. Schulenberg 35 P. 635, (Cal. 1894)
- Hart v. Carnall-Hopkins Co. 35 P. 633, (Cal. 1894)
- Burnham v. Stone 35 P. 627, (Cal. 1894)
- Jaffe v. Lilienthal 35 P. 636, (Cal. 1894)
- Levee Dist. No. 9 v. Farmer 35 P. 569, (Cal. 1894)
- Palmer v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé R.R. 35 P. 630, (Cal. 1894)
- Ex parte Ah Cue 35 P. 556, (Cal. 1894)
- Granger's Bank of Cal. v. Superior Court of San Francisco 35 P. 642, (Cal. 1894)
- Pierce v. Birkholm 47 P. 681, (Cal. 1894)
- Johnson v. Johnson 35 P. 637, (Cal. 1894)
- Watkins v. Wilhoit 35 P. 646, (Cal. 1894)
- Lee v. S. Pac. R.R. Co. 35 P. 572, (Cal. 1894)
- Craig v. San Bernardino Inv. Co. 35 P. 558, (Cal. 1894)
- Weir v. Mead 35 P. 567, (Cal. 1894)
- Brandenstein v. Hoke 35 P. 562, (Cal. 1894)
- State Inv. & Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of San Francisco 35 P. 549, (Cal. 1894)
- Harrison v. Hebbard 35 P. 555, (Cal. 1894)
- Davis v. Eames 35 P. 566, (Cal. 1894)
- Drew v. Hicks 35 P. 563, (Cal. 1894)
- Ferguson v. McBean 35 P. 559, (Cal. 1894)
- Howell v. Howell 35 P. 443, (Cal. 1894)
- Ex parte Gallagher 35 P. 449, (Cal. 1894)
- Watterson v. Saldunbehere 35 P. 432, (Cal. 1894)
- Burbank v. Dennis 35 P. 444, (Cal. 1894)
- Egener v. Juch 35 P. 432, (Cal. 1894)
- Cook v. Fowler 35 P. 431, (Cal. 1894)
- San Joaquin Land & Water Co. v. Beecher 35 P. 349, (Cal. 1894)
- Bandall v. Duff 101 Cal. 82, (Cal. 1894)
- Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co. 35 P. 442, (Cal. 1894)
- Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. Hancock 35 P. 334, (Cal. 1894)
- Gould v. Stafford 35 P. 429, (Cal. 1894)
- Barker v. Maskell 35 P. 641, (Cal. 1894)
- Payne v. English 35 P. 348, (Cal. 1894)
- Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San Francisco 35 P. 353, (Cal. 1894)
- Kenna v. Cent. Pac. R.R. Co. 35 P. 332, (Cal. 1894)
- People v. Sands 35 P. 330, (Cal. 1894)
- Duff v. Duff 35 P. 437, (Cal. 1894)