California Supreme Court, 1902

Crooks v. Crooks

Crooks v. Crooks
California Supreme Court · Decided March 12, 1902 · Temple
6 Cal. Unrep. 878; 68 P. 101

Crooks v. Crooks

Opinion of the Court

TEMPLE, J.

It appearing that the appellant has proposed a bill of exceptions to be used on the appeal, and that said bill is not yet settled and certified, and that the failure to have such bill of exceptions settled was not caused by any laches or other fault of the appellant, the motion to dismiss is denied.

We concur: Beatty, C. J.; McFarland, J.; Harrison, J.; Garoutte, J.; Van Dyke, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.