Union Collection Co. v. National Fertilizer Co.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Eller v. Salathe (Wyo. 1932)
- Successors of José Martínez v. Tomás Dávila & Co. (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1912)
- Sucesores de Martínez v. Dávila (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1912)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from the judgment on the judgment-roll alone. The complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It alleges that the defendant became indebted to plaintiff’s assignor for services rendered at defendant’s special instance and request between the first day of June, 1901, and the thirty-first day of July, 1902; that such services were of the reasonable value of $1,050, and the same has not been paid, except the sum of $46. The assignment to plaintiff is alleged to have been made on the twenty-ninth day of July, 1902, two days before the services were fully performed. The complaint states that by reason of the assignment the plaintiff “ever since has been, and now is, the owner and holder thereof.” It does not concern the defendant as to when the indebtedness was assigned to plaintiff. The findings follow the complaint and are sufficient.
There is no merit in this appeal, and the judgment is affirmed, with $100 damages to respondent.
We concur: Harrison, P. J.; Hall, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.