San Diego Realty Co. v. Cornell
San Diego Realty Co. v. Cornell
Opinion of the Court
This case is in all respects identical with that of San Diego Realty Co. v. Cornell, L. A. No. 1709, decided March 8, 1907, 150 Cal. 637, [89 Pac. 603], There was the same tender of the amount due, the same refusal to accept and an offer by plaintiff to pay the amount found justly due. The court’s findings were in accordance with the complaint, but in its decree (seemingly doubting its power to accept the tender, as was done in L. A. No. 1709), it decreed an injunction and a reassessment of the property. It- should have granted the relief plaintiff prayed for upon payment of the amount which it found to be justly due. As this may be done upon the findings actually made, there is no occasion for a reversal of the judgment, and it is ordered that the judgment be modified in this respect.
McFarland, J., and Lorigan, J., concurred.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SAN DIEGO REALTY COMPANY v. A. F. CORNELL
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Taxation—Void Description of Property—Injunction to Restrain Deed to State—Payment of Tax as Condition to Injunction.— In an action for an injunction to restrain county officers from executing a deed to the state for unpaid taxes based upon an assessment which was void for insufficiency of description of the land assessed, where the complaint offers to pay the amount of taxes equitably due, and -the amount of taxes, the value of the property, the tax-rate, and the amount due had all been fixed by the proper fiscal officers, the court should by its decree fix the amount of the tax due on the land, and order its payment as a condition to the granting of the injunction, and not decree a reassessment 'of the property. (San Diego Beatty Co. v. Cornell, 150 Cal. 637, affirmed.)