Bryant v. Hawley

California Supreme Court
Bryant v. Hawley, 7 Cal. Unrep. 342 (Cal. 1908)
94 P. 850
Taggart

Bryant v. Hawley

Opinion of the Court

TAGGART, J.

Appeal from a judgment. The action was on a promissory note executed by defendant to plaintiff and two other parties, who assigned their interests to plaintiff. Defendant by his verified answer denies that there is anything due or payable on the note, and alleges that it was given in payment of an option to purchase certain particularly described lots of land, which option to purchase he was induced to enter into by false and fraudulent representations as to the property made to him by the plaintiff. The court finds that the note was given for the option, but upon all the other issues finds in favor of plaintiff, and gives judgment in his favor.

The only points presented by appellant on the appeal relate to some matters of testimony or exhibits constituting title or showing some kind of an agreement, as to which there is no mention in the record. No question which this court can consider upon an appeal from a judgment is urged.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Allen, P. J.; Shaw, J.

Reference

Full Case Name
BRYANT v. HAWLEY
Status
Published
Syllabus
Appeal—Record.—In an Action on a Note Given for an Option to purchase lots, matters of testimony or exhibits constituting title or showing some kind o£ an agreement, as to which there is no mention in the record, cannot be considered on appeal from the judgment.1