Tattenham v. Superior Court of S.F.
California Supreme Court
Tattenham v. Superior Court of S.F., 155 Cal. 205 (Cal. 1909)
Tattenham v. Superior Court of S.F.
Opinion of the Court
This is a petition for the writ of certiorari. It is alleged that the petitioners have been enjoined in an action to which they were not parties, and therefore not subject to the jurisdiction of the court granting the injunction. If they can appeal it is conceded they have no right to the writ, and there is no doubt that they can appeal by making themselves parties in the manner pointed out in Elliott v. Superior Court, 144 Cal. 509, [103 Am. St. Rep. 102, 77 Pac. 1109].
Writ denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- DANIEL TATTENHAM v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Injunction—Person Not Party—Certiorari.—A person who has been enjoined in an action in which he was not made a party may make himself a party by moving to set aside the injunction, and if his motion is denied, may appeal from the order of denial. He is not entitled to a writ of certiorari to annul the injunction proceedings.