Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Supreme Court /

1909

264 California Supreme Court opinions from 1909.

  • Stockton Lumber Co. v. Schuler 101 P. 307, (Cal. 1909)
  • Tarpey v. Lynch 101 P. 10, (Cal. 1909)
  • Long v. Cramer Meat & Packing Co. 101 P. 297, (Cal. 1909)
  • In re Estate of Hite 101 P. 8, (Cal. 1909)
  • In re Estate of Crites 101 P. 396, (Cal. 1909)
  • Leverone v. Weakley 101 P. 304, (Cal. 1909)
  • Potrero Neuvo Land Co. v. All Persons Claiming 101 P. 12, (Cal. 1909)
  • People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist. 103 P. 207, (Cal. 1909)
  • More v. Churchill 101 P. 9, (Cal. 1909)
  • Great Western Gold Co. v. Chambers 101 P. 6, (Cal. 1909)
  • Niles v. Gonzalez 100 P. 1080, (Cal. 1909)
  • Bank of Willows v. County of Glenn 101 P. 13, (Cal. 1909)
  • Reclamation Dist. No. 535 v. Clark 100 P. 1091, (Cal. 1909)
  • Mentone Irrigation Co. v. Redlands Elec. Light & Power Co. 100 P. 1082, (Cal. 1909)
  • In re Murphy 100 P. 1134, (Cal. 1909)
  • In re Murphy 155 Cal. 322, (Cal. 1909)
  • In re Murphy 155 Cal. 322, (Cal. 1909)
  • Lucas v. Rea 101 P. 537, (Cal. 1909)
  • Varney & Green v. Williams 100 P. 867, (Cal. 1909)
  • Ward v. Sherman 100 P. 864, (Cal. 1909)
  • Cuzner v. the California Club 100 P. 868, (Cal. 1909)
  • Independence League v. Taylor 100 P. 860, (Cal. 1909)
  • Arroyo Ditch & Water Co. v. Baldwin 100 P. 874, (Cal. 1909)
  • Jameson v. James 100 P. 700, (Cal. 1909)
  • Hollywood Lumber Co. v. Love 100 P. 698, (Cal. 1909)
  • Allen v. Bryant 100 P. 704, (Cal. 1909)
  • Beyerle v. Beyerle 100 P. 702, (Cal. 1909)
  • Buchner v. Malloy 100 P. 687, (Cal. 1909)
  • Petitpierre v. Maguire 100 P. 690, (Cal. 1909)
  • People v. Moore 100 P. 688, (Cal. 1909)
  • Blood v. Munn 100 P. 694, (Cal. 1909)
  • Noble v. Cleland 100 P. 254, (Cal. 1909)
  • Noble v. Cleland 100 P. 254, (Cal. 1909)
  • People v. Cipolla 100 P. 252, (Cal. 1909)
  • Nordstrom v. Corona City Water Co. 100 P. 242, (Cal. 1909)
  • Stowell v. Rialto Irrigation Dist. 100 P. 248, (Cal. 1909)
  • Tattenham v. Superior Court 100 P. 248, (Cal. 1909)
  • Tattenham v. Superior Court of S.F. 155 Cal. 205, (Cal. 1909)
  • Tattenham v. Superior Court of S.F. 155 Cal. 205, (Cal. 1909)
  • Fox v. Workman 100 P. 246, (Cal. 1909)
  • Hibernia Savings and Loan Soc. v. Boyd 100 P. 239, (Cal. 1909)
  • Lyden v. Spohn-Patrick Co. 100 P. 236, (Cal. 1909)
  • Middelcoff v. Cronise 100 P. 232, (Cal. 1909)
  • Powell v. Allen 99 P. 865, (Cal. 1909)
  • Pedley v. Werdin 99 P. 975, (Cal. 1909)
  • Brown v. Mason 99 P. 867, (Cal. 1909)
  • Schroeder v. Happ 99 P. 715, (Cal. 1909)
  • Stevens v. Superior Court of Placer 99 P. 512, (Cal. 1909)
  • Graciosa Oil Co. v. County of Santa Barbara 99 P. 483, (Cal. 1909)
  • Tebbets v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. 99 P. 501, (Cal. 1909)
« Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑