Cardoza v. Pillsbury
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Clendaniel v. Industrial Accident Commission (Cal. 1941)
- G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Cal. 1921)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The application for a review by this court of the proceedings of the Industrial Accident Commission of the state of California states no ground upon which this court is authorized to entertain the same. The grounds stated, — namely, that the findings of the commission are not sustained by the evidence, and that the applicant has discovered new evidence material to him, are grounds upon which the commission itself may grant a rehearing (Workmen's Compensation Act, sec. 82), but the courts are restricted to the grounds stated in section 84 of said act.
The application for a writ is denied for these reasons. *Page 107
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.