People v. Reclamation District No. 108
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- People ex rel. Cepeda Rodríguez v. Pagán (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1940)
- Pueblo ex rel. Cepeda Rodríguez v. Pagán (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1940)
- People ex rel. López v. Pérez Peña (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1939)
- Pueblo ex rel. López v. Pérez Peña (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1939)
- People Ex Rel. Southwest Exploration Co. v. City of Huntington Beach (Cal. Ct. App. 1954)
- People Ex Rel. Cage v. Petroleum Rectifying Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
- People v. Milk Producers Assn. (Cal. Ct. App. 1923)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In this action quo warranto instituted by the people of the state of California upon the relation of appellants, the relatorsalone are attempting to appeal from a judgment for defendant given upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The notice of appeal states that they take the appeal "because they are parties in interest and because the attorney-general declines to take an appeal in the name of the state." Under our law such an action may be brought and maintained only by the attorney-general in the name of the people of the state, and the relators are not "parties" to the action. An attempt to appeal by them alone is necessarily ineffectual for any purpose.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. *Page 787
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.