California Supreme Court, 1917

Bond v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court · Decided February 6, 1917 · THE COURT (Speaking Through the Chief Justice).

163 P. 496; 174 Cal. 376; 1917 Cal. LEXIS 802

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

May v. Farrell (Cal. Ct. App. 1928)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

On the conclusion of the oral argument, the following opinion was rendered: The court is of the opinion that the case is not distinguishable from Huerstal v. Muir, 62 Cal. 479, that the amendment to section 1210 of the Code of Civil Procedure has not changed the law in the respect suggested, and does not grant or confer any right of appeal in such a matter, that under these circumstances Huerstal v. Muir, 62 Cal. 479, controls, and the portion of the order complained of in this proceeding should be annulled.

It is so ordered.

Sloss, J., Melvin, J., and Lawlor, J., dissented.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.