Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm.
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Carrigan v. California State Legislature (9th Cir. 1959)
- Carrigan v. California State Legislature (9th Cir. 1959)
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission (Cal. 1924)
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission (Cal. Ct. App. 1928)
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission (Cal. 1925)
- McFeely v. Industrial Accident Commission (Cal. Ct. App. 1923)
- Reid v. Automatic Electric Washer Co. (Iowa 1920)
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission (Cal. 1919)
- Employers' L. A. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com. (Cal. 1918)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The hearsay testimony complained of relative to the statements of the deceased employee relating directly to his injury was competent under the provisions of section 77a of the Workmen's Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act, as amended in 1915, [Stats. 1915, p. 1102].
We are satisfied that such provisions cannot be held invalid as opposed to any provision of our constitution.
The application for a writ of review is denied.
Rehearing denied. *Page 316
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.