Bancroft v. Bancroft
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Greenwood v. Greenwood (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
- Heathman v. Vant (Cal. Ct. App. 1959)
- Sapp v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1953)
- Deyl v. Deyl (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)
- Cowan v. Cowan (Cal. Ct. App. 1946)
- Spahn v. Spahn (Cal. Ct. App. 1945)
- Sheldon v. Sheldon (Cal. Ct. App. 1945)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from that portion of a final judgment decreeing a divorce between the parties to this action. The facts of the case are fully set forth in the case of Bancroft v. Bancroft, ante, p. 352, [173 Pac. 582]. The matters upon which the appellant predicates her right to a reversal herein occurred prior to the inception of the action, and were, therefore, the subject of review upon an appeal from the inter *367 locutory decree had such appeal been taken, and hence cannot be made the subject of review upon an appeal from the final decree. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 956; Claudius v. Melvin, 146 Cal. 257, [79 Pac. 897]; Suttman v. Superior Court, 174 Cal. 243, [162 Pac. 1032]; Newell v. Superior Court, 27 Cal. App. 343, [149 Pac. 998]; Reed v. Reed, 9 Cal. App. 748, [100 Pac. 897].) In addition to this, however, the points discussed upon this appeal have been decided adversely to the appellant’s contention in the case of Bancroft v. Bancroft ante, p. 359, [173 Pac. 579], and upon the conclusions arrived at in that decision the portion of the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.