Cornic v. Stewart
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Financial Corp. of America v. Wilburn (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)
- Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. Davies (Cal. 1967)
- Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. Davies (Cal. 1967)
- Collins v. City & County of San Francisco (Cal. Ct. App. 1952)
- Penland v. Golden (Cal. Ct. App. 1951)
- Randall v. Beber (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)
- Kline v. Beauchamp (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
- Rinaldo v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1936)
- Martinsen v. Ford Motor Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
- Christensen v. Lucerne Holding Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
- Hurley v. Lake County (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
- Hurley v. Lake County (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
- Sturgeon v. City of Hawthorne (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In this case no respondent's brief has been filed, but a cursory examination of the record discloses that the only appear before us is an attempted appeal from two orders of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff's first amended complaint and denying the plaintiff's application for leave to file a second amended complaint. Neither of these orders are appealable orders and there is no appeal from the judgment. It follows that the appeals must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.
*Page 243Sloss, J., and Victor E. Shaw, J., pro tem., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.