Cornic v. Stewart

California Supreme Court
Cornic v. Stewart, 179 Cal. 242 (Cal. 1918)
Richards

Cornic v. Stewart

Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem.

In this case no respondent’s brief has been filed, but a cursory examination of the record discloses that the only appeal before us is an attempted appeal from two orders of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s first amended complaint and denying the plaintiff’s application for leave to file a second amended complaint. Neither of these orders are appealable orders and there is no appeal from the judgment. It follows that the appeals must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Sloss, J., and Victor E. Shaw, J., pro tem., concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
J. W. CORNIC v. GERTIE E. STEWART
Status
Published
Syllabus
Appeal—Order Sustaining Demurrer—Dismissal.—No appeal lies from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint or from one denying application for leave to file an amended complaint, and attempted appeals from such orders will.be dismissed.