California Supreme Court, 1921

Wollenshlager v. Riegel

Wollenshlager v. Riegel
California Supreme Court · Decided August 4, 1921 · THE COURT.
200 P. 726; 186 Cal. 622; 1921 Cal. LEXIS 486

Wollenshlager v. Riegel

Opinion of the Court

The petition of appellants for a supersedeas shows that the action in the court below was to procure an injunction to stay an execution sale. The injunction was refused. Appellants ask asupersedeas to stay the execution which they sought to have enjoined in the court below. The effect would be that this court would grant the injunction which the court below refused to grant. [1] It is well established that this court is without power to exercise *Page 623 original jurisdiction of this character. (Napa etc. Co. v.Calistoga etc. Co., 174 Cal. 411, [163 P. 497]; Hicks v.Michael, 15 Cal. 109.)

The application for a supersedeas is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.