Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Company

California Supreme Court
Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Company, 195 P. 401 (Cal. 1921)
184 Cal. 809; 1921 Cal. LEXIS 633
THE COURT.

Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Company

Opinion of the Court

Although they are three separate and independent suits, the three above-mentioned cases are identical in their facts with the facts of the case of Runkle v. Southern Pacific MillingCo., ante, p. 714, [195 P. 398]. The points urged for a reversal in these cases by appellant, Southern Pacific Milling Company, are the same as those which were presented in said case of Runkle v. Southern Pacific Milling Co., and, therefore, what we have said in the latter case sufficiently disposes of the points made. Upon the authority of that case the judgments in these three cases are affirmed.

*Page 1

Reference

Full Case Name
C. J. Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Company (A Corporation), the Patterson Ranch Company (A Corporation) v. Southern Pacific Milling Company (A Corporation), Aetna Insurance Company (A Corporation) v. Southern Pacific Milling Company (A Corporation)
Status
Published