Ferry v. Marr
Ferry v. Marr
206 P. 454; 188 Cal. 798; 1922 Cal. LEXIS 486
Ferry v. Marr
Opinion of the Court
This appeal is identical, as to the questions involved, with the appeal in the case of Ferry v. O'Brien, ante, p. 629 [
Richards, J., pro tem., Shurtleff, J., Lawlor, J., Sloane, J., and Wilbur, J., concurred.
Shaw, C. J., being disqualified by relationship to plaintiff's attorney, did not participate.
*Page 799Rehearing denied.
All the Justices concurred, except Shaw, C. J., who did not participate, owing to relationship to attorney for respondent.
Waste, J., was absent, and Richards, J., pro tem., was acting.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.