In re Jordan
In re Jordan
190 Cal. 416
In re Jordan
Opinion of the Court
The petitioner was given an indeterminate sentence for robbery. The petitioner claims that the sentence is void for uncertainty, citing People v. Sama, 189 Cal. 153 [207 Pac. 893]; People v. Mendosa, 178 Cal. 509 [193 Pac. 998] ; In re Lee, 177 Cal. 690 [171 Pac. 958], and Penal Code, sections 213, 671, and 1168.
The sentence was, in effect, for the maximum term provided by law. (In re Lee, supra.)
The petition is denied.
Wilbur, C. J., Myers, J., Seawell, J., Waste, J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.