In re Wignall
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Quinn (Cal. 1945)
- Isett v. Frees (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
- McKenzie v. Santa Fe Trail Stages (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
- Lindenberg v. Brodek (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
- People v. Hayes (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
- People v. Clement (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. Lee (N.D. 1925)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
At the conclusion of the oral argument the Chief Justice made the following statement:
[1] The Chief Justice: The members of the court are satisfied that the first judgment pronounced by the trial *Page 388
court, which recited the verdict of the jury finding the petitioner guilty of the offense stated in the information, to wit, a conspiracy to obtain personal property to a value of more than one hundred dollars by false pretenses, was a sufficient sentence of the defendant for the term provided by law for conspiracy to commit a felony, that is, a sentence for the maximum term of ten years, as we construe section
Mr. Todd: Do your honors rule as to when the first term begins?
The Chief Justice: From the date of the first sentence.
Prisoner remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.