California Supreme Court, 1924

North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Fitch

North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Fitch
California Supreme Court · Decided February 25, 1924
193 Cal. 336

North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Fitch

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The respondents moved to dismiss the appeal from the judgment taken by the appellants upon the ground that the notice of appeal - was filed too late. This question turns upon whether or not there was a motion pending for a new trial. Appellants claim that the notice of intention to move for a new trial was not properly served and filed. Since the hearing of the motion affidavits have been filed showing that the notice of intention to move for a new trial was properly served by mail. The notice *337of appeal from the judgment was filed within due time after the disposition of the motion for a new trial and the motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment is, therefore, denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.