Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Supreme Court /

1928

461 California Supreme Court opinions from 1928.

  • Newsom v. Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County 270 P. 676, (Cal. 1928)
  • Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank 270 P. 672, (Cal. 1928)
  • Unruh v. Kauffman 270 P. 440, (Cal. 1928)
  • Redd v. Garford Motor Truck Co., Inc. 270 P. 447, (Cal. 1928)
  • McIntyre v. Consolidated Water Co. 270 P. 444, (Cal. 1928)
  • Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Johnson 270 P. 371, (Cal. 1928)
  • Swallow v. Tungsten Products Co. 270 P. 366, (Cal. 1928)
  • Adams v. Petroleum Midway Co., Ltd. 270 P. 668, (Cal. 1928)
  • Rogers v. Schneider 270 P. 451, (Cal. 1928)
  • Ayres v. Wright 270 P. 453, (Cal. 1928)
  • Pista v. Resetar 270 P. 453, (Cal. 1928)
  • Ayres v. Wright 205 Cal. 201, (Cal. 1928)
  • Ayres v. Wright 205 Cal. 201, (Cal. 1928)
  • Parsons v. Luhr 270 P. 443, (Cal. 1928)
  • Newson v. Hawley 270 P. 364, (Cal. 1928)
  • La Count v. Pasarich 270 P. 210, (Cal. 1928)
  • Boust v. Boust 270 P. 209, (Cal. 1928)
  • McCarthy v. McCarthy 270 P. 211, (Cal. 1928)
  • Great Western Syndicate v. Superior Court of San Francisco 270 P. 200, (Cal. 1928)
  • Golden Gate Building Materials Co. v. Fireman 270 P. 214, (Cal. 1928)
  • United Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Superior Court of Orange County 270 P. 184, (Cal. 1928)
  • Chadwick v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County 270 P. 192, (Cal. 1928)
  • Lewis v. Grunberg 270 P. 181, (Cal. 1928)
  • Borland v. Key System Transit Co. 270 P. 194, (Cal. 1928)
  • Foster v. Fernandes 270 P. 188, (Cal. 1928)
  • Rice v. Dunlap 270 P. 196, (Cal. 1928)
  • Gould v. Wood 270 P. 183, (Cal. 1928)
  • Sugarman Iron & Metal Co. v. Miller & Lux, Inc. 269 P. 1113, (Cal. 1928)
  • Rice v. Dunlap 270 P. 199, (Cal. 1928)
  • H. K. McCann Co. v. Denny 270 P. 190, (Cal. 1928)
  • Telegraph Avenue Corp. v. Raentsch 269 P. 1109, (Cal. 1928)
  • County of Tulare v. City of Dinuba 270 P. 201, (Cal. 1928)
  • Stark v. Hoeft 269 P. 1105, (Cal. 1928)
  • Ritterbusch v. City of Pittsburg 269 P. 930, (Cal. 1928)
  • McNett v. Volfi 269 P. 932, (Cal. 1928)
  • Peak v. Spitzer 269 P. 924, (Cal. 1928)
  • Whalen v. Streshley 269 P. 928, (Cal. 1928)
  • California Rendering Co. v. Pacific Electric Railway 269 P. 922, (Cal. 1928)
  • Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co. 269 P. 921, (Cal. 1928)
  • Consolidated Peoples Ditch Co. v. Foothill Ditch Co. 269 P. 915, (Cal. 1928)
  • Atlantic Fish Co. v. Dollar Steamship Line 269 P. 926, (Cal. 1928)
  • Platt v. Platt 269 P. 657, (Cal. 1928)
  • Wayt v. Patee 269 P. 660, (Cal. 1928)
  • Rosetti v. Casazza 269 P. 637, (Cal. 1928)
  • Sacramento Transportation Co. v. California Reclamation Co. 269 P. 640, (Cal. 1928)
  • Mills v. Brown 269 P. 636, (Cal. 1928)
  • Palmer v. Continental Casualty Co. 269 P. 638, (Cal. 1928)
  • People v. Malone 269 P. 628, (Cal. 1928)
  • Logan v. Thorne 269 P. 626, (Cal. 1928)
  • Hartzell v. Doolittle 269 P. 527, (Cal. 1928)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 10 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑