California Supreme Court, 1929

Esaisa v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court · Decided July 31, 1929

207 Cal. 796

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Garland Co. v. Filmer (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1932)
Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. Felt (Cal. 1931)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This matter comes to us upon a petition for a writ of review to determine the legality of the findings and judgment and other proceedings leading up to the formation of the proposed Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District, which matter has been .determined by the *797defendant Superior Court contrary to the contentions of petitioner. The questions raised have all been disposed of in a case from the county of Napa, California, involving precisely the same legal situation, which case has been this day decided by this court. (Wheatley v. Superior Court et al. [S. F. No. 13281 of the records of this court], ante, p. 722 [279 Pac. 989].)

For the reasons stated in the case last cited, the proceedings are affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.