Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Supreme Court /

1929

364 California Supreme Court opinions from 1929.

  • California National Bank v. El Dorado Lime & Minerals Co. 279 P. 775, (Cal. 1929)
  • Hills v. Superior Court 279 P. 805, (Cal. 1929)
  • Rafferty v. City of Marysville 280 P. 118, (Cal. 1929)
  • Merced Security Savings Bank v. Bent Bros. 279 P. 765, (Cal. 1929)
  • Keiper v. Dunn 279 P. 772, (Cal. 1929)
  • Calhoma Oil Corp. v. Conniff 279 P. 771, (Cal. 1929)
  • Oakland Terminal & Elevator Corp. v. Mercantile Trust Co. 280 P. 107, (Cal. 1929)
  • Oakland Terminal & Elevator Corp. v. Mercantile Trust Co. 280 P. 107, (Cal. 1929)
  • Webster Mfg. Co. v. Byrnes 280 P. 101, (Cal. 1929)
  • Perry v. Magneson 279 P. 650, (Cal. 1929)
  • San Bernardino National Bank v. Jones 279 P. 657, (Cal. 1929)
  • Lockie v. Cooperative Land Co. 279 P. 428, (Cal. 1929)
  • People v. Koehn 279 P. 646, (Cal. 1929)
  • Stewart v. Engelberg 279 P. 661, (Cal. 1929)
  • California Packing Corp. v. Lopez 279 P. 664, (Cal. 1929)
  • Lynch v. Lynch 279 P. 653, (Cal. 1929)
  • City of Yuba City v. Consolidated Mausoleum Syndicate 279 P. 427, (Cal. 1929)
  • Parker v. Tout 279 P. 431, (Cal. 1929)
  • In re Mayhew 279 P. 444, (Cal. 1929)
  • Shaw v. Feehan 279 P. 658, (Cal. 1929)
  • Witherill v. Brehm 279 P. 432, (Cal. 1929)
  • Esposti v. Rivers Brothers, Inc. 279 P. 423, (Cal. 1929)
  • In re Mayhew 207 Cal. 560, (Cal. 1929)
  • In re Mayhew 207 Cal. 560, (Cal. 1929)
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Mathews 279 P. 655, (Cal. 1929)
  • Huntly v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 279 P. 425, (Cal. 1929)
  • Leala v. Carroll 279 P. 443, (Cal. 1929)
  • In re Lovall 279 P. 452, (Cal. 1929)
  • Yuba River Power Co. v. Nevada Irrigation District 279 P. 128, (Cal. 1929)
  • Haynes v. MacFarlane 279 P. 436, (Cal. 1929)
  • Weinstein v. Moers 279 P. 444, (Cal. 1929)
  • Murnane v. Le Mesnager 279 P. 800, (Cal. 1929)
  • People v. Lazarus 279 P. 145, (Cal. 1929)
  • Morris v. Warner 279 P. 152, (Cal. 1929)
  • Newport v. Hatton 279 P. 134, (Cal. 1929)
  • Whitmore v. Brown 279 P. 447, (Cal. 1929)
  • Wallner v. Barry 279 P. 148, (Cal. 1929)
  • Podrat v. Oberndorff 278 P. 1035, (Cal. 1929)
  • People v. Bryant 278 P. 1025, (Cal. 1929)
  • Rankin v. Mills 278 P. 1044, (Cal. 1929)
  • In re Cate 279 P. 131, (Cal. 1929)
  • Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. City of Los Angeles 278 P. 1028, (Cal. 1929)
  • Chun Kam v. Myers 279 P. 156, (Cal. 1929)
  • Oatman v. Niemeyer 278 P. 1043, (Cal. 1929)
  • Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co. 278 P. 1038, (Cal. 1929)
  • People v. Hawley 279 P. 136, (Cal. 1929)
  • Estate of Heuler 278 P. 1031, (Cal. 1929)
  • Mission Film Corp. v. Chadwick Pictures Corp. 278 P. 855, (Cal. 1929)
  • Murray v. Superior Court 278 P. 1033, (Cal. 1929)
  • Congdon v. G. M. H. Wagner & Sons 278 P. 863, (Cal. 1929)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 8 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑