Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A.

California Supreme Court February 21, 1930

Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A., 285 P. 698 (Cal. 1930)

209 Cal. 779; 1930 Cal. LEXIS 554

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

[1] Upon the authority of Hansen v. Municipal Court, 208 Cal. 506 [282 P. 384], and Keaton v. Municipal Court (L.A. No. 11849),ante, p. 52 [285 P. 696], this day decided, we are of the opinion that the peremptory writ of mandate should be issued as prayed for, and it is so ordered.

Reference

Full Case Name: Nathan Schwartz v. Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles, Etc.
Status: Published