Takata v. Riley

California Supreme Court
Takata v. Riley, 4 P.2d 158 (Cal. 1931)
214 Cal. 93; 1931 Cal. LEXIS 397

Takata v. Riley

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

At the close of oral argument the chief justice announced the decision of the court as follows:

[1] The question involved is not new. We have examined it a great many times. On the authority of Estate of Wellings,192 Cal. 506, 519 [221 P. 628], Heron v. Riley, 209 Cal. 507 [289 P. 160], Frank v. Maguire, 201 Cal. 414 [257 P. 515], Buelke v. Levenstadt, 190 Cal. 684 [214 P. 42], and cases referred to therein, we are of the view that the title of this act is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Constitution. The writ will issue.

Reference

Full Case Name
Grace Takata v. Ray L. Riley, as State Controller, Etc.
Status
Published