California Supreme Court, 1931

Takata v. Riley

Takata v. Riley
California Supreme Court · Decided October 8, 1931
4 P.2d 158; 214 Cal. 93; 1931 Cal. LEXIS 397 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Takata v. Riley

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

At the close of oral argument the chief justice announced the decision of the court as follows:

[1] The question involved is not new. We have examined it a great many times. On the authority of Estate of Wellings,192 Cal. 506, 519 [221 P. 628], Heron v. Riley, 209 Cal. 507 [289 P. 160], Frank v. Maguire, 201 Cal. 414 [257 P. 515], Buelke v. Levenstadt, 190 Cal. 684 [214 P. 42], and cases referred to therein, we are of the view that the title of this act is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Constitution. The writ will issue.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.