California Supreme Court, 1931

Peterson v. Ball

California Supreme Court · Decided January 30, 1931

296 P. 300; 211 Cal. 779; 1931 Cal. LEXIS 762

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Merrill v. Los Angeles Cotton Mills, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
Hess v. Country Club Park (Cal. 1931)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In this action the same questions are presented as were before the court in the case of Fred E. Peterson v. W.F. Ball (L.A. No. 10957), ante, p. 461 [296 P. 291], this day decided. The parties are practically the same in each action and the only difference in the two relates to the amount of the indebtedness claimed to have been illegally incurred. The same procedure was had in this action as was taken in the prior action, L.A. No. 10957, and resulted in a judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants herein. [1] On the authority of the prior action, the judgment herein is affirmed.

*Page 1

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.