Takata v. Riley
California Supreme Court
Takata v. Riley, 214 Cal. 93 (Cal. 1931)
Takata v. Riley
Opinion of the Court
At the close of oral argument the chief justice announced the decision of the court as follows:
The question involved is not new. We have examined it a great many times. On the authority of Estate of Wellings, 192 Cal. 506, 519 [221 Pac. 628], Heron v. Riley, 209 Cal. 507 [289 Pac. 160], Frank v. Maguire, 201 Cal. 414 [257 Pac. 515], Buelke v. Levenstadt, 190 Cal. 684 [214 Pac. 42], and cases referred to therein, we are of the view that the title of this act is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Constitution. The writ will issue.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- GRACE TAKATA v. RAY L. RILEY, as State Controller, etc.
- Status
- Published