Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Supreme Court /

1931

397 California Supreme Court opinions from 1931.

  • Walbridge v. Richards 298 P. 971, (Cal. 1931)
  • Maede v. Oakland High School District 298 P. 987, (Cal. 1931)
  • Estate of Sayles 298 P. 971, (Cal. 1931)
  • Jacobsen v. Industrial Accident Commission 299 P. 66, (Cal. 1931)
  • Zurich Etc. Ins. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com. 299 P. 70, (Cal. 1931)
  • Young v. Hoagland 298 P. 996, (Cal. 1931)
  • Meyers v. Berg 298 P. 806, (Cal. 1931)
  • Cockerill v. State Bar 298 P. 807, (Cal. 1931)
  • Camp v. Oakland Mortgage & Finance Co. 298 P. 974, (Cal. 1931)
  • Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission 212 Cal. 451, (Cal. 1931)
  • First National Bank v. Thompson 298 P. 808, (Cal. 1931)
  • Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission 298 P. 991, (Cal. 1931)
  • Schaffer v. State 298 P. 994, (Cal. 1931)
  • Central Pacific Railway Co. v. County of Alameda 299 P. 75, (Cal. 1931)
  • Lavely v. Nonemaker 298 P. 976, (Cal. 1931)
  • Schaefer v. State Bar 212 Cal. 367, (Cal. 1931)
  • Kutner-Goldstein Co. v. Superior Court 298 P. 1001, (Cal. 1931)
  • Henningsen v. Anderson 298 P. 999, (Cal. 1931)
  • Poncino v. Reid-Murdoch & Co. 298 P. 818, (Cal. 1931)
  • Pacific Fruit Exchange v. Barkhaus 298 P. 965, (Cal. 1931)
  • Damgaard v. Oakland High School District 298 P. 983, (Cal. 1931)
  • City of Pasadena v. Superior Court 298 P. 968, (Cal. 1931)
  • Controversy Between California Toll Bridge Authority & City & County of San Francisco v. Wentworth 298 P. 485, (Cal. 1931)
  • Democa v. Barasch 298 P. 17, (Cal. 1931)
  • Henkel v. J. J. Henkel Co. 298 P. 28, (Cal. 1931)
  • People v. Pantages 297 P. 890, (Cal. 1931)
  • Watson v. Division of Motor Vehicles 298 P. 481, (Cal. 1931)
  • Lantz v. State Bar 298 P. 497, (Cal. 1931)
  • Howe v. State Bar 298 P. 25, (Cal. 1931)
  • City of Pasadena v. Estrin 298 P. 14, (Cal. 1931)
  • People v. Perry 298 P. 19, (Cal. 1931)
  • City of Pasadena v. Nick Estrin 298 P. 17, (Cal. 1931)
  • Herron v. State Bar 298 P. 474, (Cal. 1931)
  • City of Pasadena v. Estrin 212 Cal. 790, (Cal. 1931)
  • City of Pasadena v. Estrin 212 Cal. 790, (Cal. 1931)
  • Maison v. Puntenney 298 P. 33, (Cal. 1931)
  • People v. Darrow 298 P. 1, (Cal. 1931)
  • Pacific Employers Insurance v. French 298 P. 23, (Cal. 1931)
  • James v. Haley 297 P. 920, (Cal. 1931)
  • The Pacific Co., Ltd. v. Johnson 298 P. 489, (Cal. 1931)
  • Unruh v. Nelson 297 P. 888, (Cal. 1931)
  • Southern California Tele. Co. v. County of Los Angeles 298 P. 14, (Cal. 1931)
  • Southern California Tele. Co. v. County of Los Angeles 298 P. 14, (Cal. 1931)
  • Hansen v. Burford 297 P. 908, (Cal. 1931)
  • The Pacific Tele. Tele. Co. v. County of Los Angeles 298 P. 14, (Cal. 1931)
  • Smallberg v. State Bar 297 P. 916, (Cal. 1931)
  • The Pacific Tele. Tele. Co. v. County of Los Angeles 298 P. 13, (Cal. 1931)
  • Southern California Tele. Co. v. County of Los Angeles 298 P. 13, (Cal. 1931)
  • Nelson v. Lake Hemet Water Co. 297 P. 914, (Cal. 1931)
  • Southern California Telephone Co. v. County of Los Angeles 298 P. 9, (Cal. 1931)
« Prev 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑