Hutt v. Corser
Hutt v. Corser
20 P.2d 327; 217 Cal. 606; 1933 Cal. LEXIS 665
(Pacific Reporter, Second Series)
Hutt v. Corser
Opinion of the Court
[1] Action to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. His brief presents no question of law but is at most an attempt to recite the evidence in the case, which on its face discloses not only conflicting evidence but a preponderance thereof in favor of respondent's claims.
The motion to dismiss the appeal heretofore made herein, and submitted, is denied. The judgment is affirmed.
Curtis, J., Langdon, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., Thompson, J., and Waste, C.J., concurred. *Page 607
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.