California Supreme Court, 1933

Hutt v. Corser

Hutt v. Corser
California Supreme Court · Decided March 31, 1933 · Preston
217 Cal. 606

Hutt v. Corser

Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, J.

Action to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. His brief presents no question of law but is at most an attempt to recite the evidence in the case, which on its face discloses not only conflicting evidence but a preponderance thereof in favor of respondent’s. claims.

The motion to dismiss the appeal heretofore made herein, and submitted, is denied. The judgment is affirmed.

Curtis, J., Langdon, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., Thompson, J., and Waste, C. J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.