This is an action to quiet title and to obtain declaratory relief in respect to rights arising under an *765oil lease. The action raises the same issues as those presented in the companion case of Sutphin v. Speik, L. A. No. 17142 (ante, p. 195 [99 Pac. (2d) 652]), this day decided. On the authority of that ease the judgment is affirmed.

Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Curtis, J., Waste, C. J., Wood, J., pro tem., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

Rehearing denied. Shenk, J., and Houser, J., did not participate.