California Supreme Court, 1940

Speik v. Sutphin

California Supreme Court · Decided February 29, 1940 · Gibson

15 Cal. 2d 764; 99 P.2d 656; 1940 Cal. LEXIS 270

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Sutphin v. Speik (Cal. 1940)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, J.

This is an action to quiet title and to obtain declaratory relief in respect to rights arising under an *765oil lease. The action raises the same issues as those presented in the companion case of Sutphin v. Speik, L. A. No. 17142 (ante, p. 195 [99 Pac. (2d) 652]), this day decided. On the authority of that ease the judgment is affirmed.

Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Curtis, J., Waste, C. J., Wood, J., pro tem., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

Rehearing denied. Shenk, J., and Houser, J., did not participate.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.