People v. Braeseke
Cases that cite this one
22 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Memro (Cal. 1995)
- People v. Mattson (Cal. 1990)
- People v. Williams (Cal. 1981)
- People v. Johnson (Cal. 1993)
- People v. Prysock (Cal. Ct. App. 1982)
- People v. Smith (Cal. 2007)
- People v. Johnwell (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)
- State v. Pillar (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2003)
- People v. Nicholas (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)
- People v. Woods (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)
- People v. Visciotti (Cal. 1992)
- People v. Drake (Colo. 1988)
- People v. Davis (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)
- Green v. Superior Court (Cal. 1985)
- People v. San Nicolas (Cal. 2004)
- People v. Castellanos (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)
- People v. Rowland (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)
- State v. Velarde (Utah 1986)
- People v. Dingle (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)
- People v. James (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)
- People v. Hinds (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)
- People v. Diaz (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Opinion
The Supreme Court of the United States on May 12, 1980, issued its order and judgment that “the judgment of the Supreme Court of California in this cause is vacated, and that this cause is remanded to the Supreme Court of California to consider whether its judgment is based on federal or state constitutional grounds, or both.” 446 U.S. 932 [64 L.Ed.2d 784, 100 S.Ct. 2147].
*87 Pursuant to this mandate we have reexamined our opinion in this case (reported at 25 Cal.3d 691 [159 Cal.Rptr. 684, 602 P.2d 384]) and certify our judgment is based upon Miranda v. Arizona (1965) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974] and the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Inasmuch as we deem it unnecessary to alter our prior opinion, we reiterate it in its entirety.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.