Branick v. DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2005)
- Abels v. JBC Legal Group, P.C. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2005)
- Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)
- Standfacts Credit Services, Inc. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (United States District Court for the Central District of California 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
BRANICK
v.
DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN.
Supreme Court of California.
Petition for review granted; issues limited
Petition for review GRANTED.
The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: If the standing limitations of Proposition 64 apply to actions under the Unfair Competition Law that were pending on November 3, 2004, may a plaintiff amend his or her complaint to substitute in or add a party that satisfies standing requirements of Business and Professions Code section 17204, as amended, and does such an amended complaint relate back to the initial complaint for statute of limitations purposes?
GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.